Website image sizes: smaller and faster load times vs bigger images with more image quality

red_zergling

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Nov 30, 2017
Messages
249
Location
United States
I recently started resizing my images to 2560 by 2160 (if I recall it correctly) instead of WordPress recommend 2160 by 1920. I figured it wouldn't impact load time too much but it's missing marks on some of the benchmarks in Google Chromes developer console.

For anyone with a portfolio, what is your approach to how you resize and display images?

I'm thinking I will switch back to 1920 and then provide an additional page somewhere for higher resolutions.

Here is my website as of now, which is still in the middle of a makeover. https://boni.photo.
 

barry

Super Moderator
Joined
Mar 7, 2014
Messages
10,757
Location
Southern California
Hi, those benchmarks are aimed at the average website, not a photography one.

Unless you use this as an off-site backup or archive, I would aim at whatever the highest resolution they're going to be displayed at is. That may be hard to estimate though if using a fully responsive theme.

IIRC it is possible for WP or a gallery plugin to create multiple sizes of each image, so when displaying multiple images in columns the page loads faster. But it's been quite awhile since I've worked on WP frontend stuff.
 

BobBill

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
362
Location
MN USA
Real Name
Bob Hively-Johnson
Sensors..FWIW; on-line source...

Full-frame image sensors are 35mm in diameter, the same size as old school celluloid film. Hence the name full-frame. There are many smaller frame sensors (known as crop sensors), and smartphone sensors are found at the tail end of the spectrum.
SensorSizes.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Various sensor sizes. Source: techspot.com
A full-frame 35mm sensor measures 864mm2 while a 1/1.7” smartphone sensor only measures 43mm2. That means the once-praised Huawei P30 Pro’s sensor, for example, is 20 times smaller than a full-frame DSLR sensor. That’s a lot!
 

John King

Member of SOFA
Joined
Apr 20, 2020
Messages
5,797
Location
Cameraderie.org or Beaumaris, Melbourne, Australia
Real Name
John ...
I recently started resizing my images to 2560 by 2160 (if I recall it correctly) instead of WordPress recommend 2160 by 1920. I figured it wouldn't impact load time too much but it's missing marks on some of the benchmarks in Google Chromes developer console.

For anyone with a portfolio, what is your approach to how you resize and display images?

I'm thinking I will switch back to 1920 and then provide an additional page somewhere for higher resolutions.

Here is my website as of now, which is still in the middle of a makeover. https://boni.photo.
Nice photos, but you might need a much faster web server if you want to keep this design!

Perhaps avoid using WP as a photo server?

I use WP as a frontend to my gallery s/w (ZenPhoto). Not as pretty, but hugely faster.

As for resizing, I use exactly half to avoid interpolation artifacts.

I uploaded 91 images yesterday, 315 MB. It took 1m45s.

HTH.
 

Latest threads

Top Bottom